On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Greg A. Woods wrote:

> Hmmmm....  if the snapshot sources included CVS subdirectories then they
> might be of some benefit -- that way many potential CVS-related problems
> could usually be identified (eg. uncommitted changes included in the
> snapshot), and of course anyone making changes to the snapshot sources
> would be better able to identify their local changes (i.e. generate
> reliable diffs).

Both the weekly tarballs, and even the sup, include the CVS
subdirectories, with cvsroot pointed to anoncvs@netbsd.org.

Frederick