Subject: Re: OT: - help needed
To: None <>
From: Greg A. Woods <>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 01/30/2002 13:37:57
[ On Wednesday, January 30, 2002 at 13:35:43 (+0100), Thomas Michael Wanka wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: OT: - help needed
> this is only true, as long as the law does not prohibit the terms of 
> agreement 1 to be part of agreement 2. 

This might be true, but if you've signed contract #1 for the express
purpose of re-selling the purchased service under contract #2 then you
should have made sure contract #1 was compliant with your local laws,
given the purpose you have in mind.  That's why you really do always
need legal representation when forming a business contract of any
potential importance.

> Of course it is correct, that if B is a dealer B must know the laws 
> and his risks. 


								Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098;  <>;  <>;  <>
Planix, Inc. <>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <>