Subject: Re: Thread Performance in NetBSD
To: Caffeinate The World <mochaexpress@yahoo.com>
From: Marina Brown <marina@surferz.net>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 01/10/2002 23:51:44
Dear Caffinate:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Caffeinate The World wrote:
Thanks a lot for your answer !
>=20
> on i386, MySQL's derived mit-pthread had worked fine for a long time.
> on the Alpha, between 1.4.2 and 1.5x, excluding 1.5.2, I had to compile
> with GNU pth to get MySQL to not coredump. with 1.5.2, on Alpha, MySQL
> 3.23.4X has worked flawlessly, thus far. on some other apps, i found
> PTL2 thread to be more stable (this chat app i had).
>=20
> oddly enough, PostgreSQL has worked wonderfully on all the platforms i
> tested. it forks instead of threads. i'm in the process of converting a
> particular state web site with heavy traffic from MySQL to PostgreSQL.
>=20
If it were my choice, i would be using postgresSQL as well, but the clien=
t
is asking for Mysql. They are a particularly arrogant and difficult clien=
t, so
i'm not arguing -- if things break they will be charged full rate ;-).
It's odd how sometimes the more antiquated ways like forking work better.
I would MUCH rather use threads, but postgres seems like a better choice
a lot of the time.
Marina Brown
--=20
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D
"You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a
reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating=20
the very phrases which our founding fathers used in their struggle for
independence" -- Charles A. Beard (1874-1948) US historian =20
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D