David Laight writes:

>> All commercial systems which come with ksh normally use System V
>> semantics...
>
>Yes - is netbsd actually broken here?

I remember someone quoting something like, "BSD, like Buddha having
the Buddha nature, has the BSD nature", that is, if you find systems
today which use the BSD style of doing things instead of System V,
you'll probably find them in the *BSD universe.

--mkb