Subject: Re: bridging
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Emre Yildirim <email@example.com>
Date: 09/02/2001 23:36:48
Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> (1) You can only filter IP. You want to be able to filter
> other things, like Appletalk, etc.
> (2) The way IP Filter expects to have the packet means you
> have to do some pretty ugly packet frobbing before passing
> it off to the filter.
> (3) If you are also using IP Filter on the host that is
> implementing the bridge, you can't use different rule
> sets for the host and the bridge.
Hmm, how is OpenBSD doing it? Do they have the same problem?
But I guess they have their own funky packet filter now, so doesn't
apply to them?
>#3 is really the show-stopper.
>I'm working on a more generic solution, but it's not as high on my
>priority list as some other things (like getting the MP support for
>the i386 merged down onto the main branch, and some customer porting
Thats completely understandable, MP is more important than this :-).
I'm glad that there is some sort of bridging support in NetBSD though.
I should be able to test this in a few weeks when I have more machines