Subject: Re: DEC vt320 terminal problem
To: NetBSD User's Discussion List <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Shannon Hendrix <email@example.com>
Date: 07/09/2001 17:07:54
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 01:23:59PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > I guess this must be an issue with NetBSD-sparc's serial ports, because
> > it seems fine on an Intel machine.
> I still haven't tried the UART driver changes that should fix this
> problem, but I suspect they'll help a lot.
Do you have any code yet that I could play with?
> > It would help a great deal if the
> > shells would issue a simple linefeed/carriage return instead of just
> > running the cursor to EOL and depending on autowrap.
> Well, you can turn off all those features.... ;-)
> (I.e. you can't eat your cake and have it too in this case -- if you
> want command-line editing in your shell then you'll have to live with it
> behaving more like a full-screen editor than a text application! ;-)
Well, I think some libraries must do things differently. Certainly
command-line editing works with shells when they issue the LF/CR
combination instead of using autowrap. I perused the sources to tcsh but
ran out of time before I found what I wanted.
But like you said, fixing NetBSD would be better in the long run. I
still haven't had time to test with NetBSD-Intel, only FreeBSD.
> > Also, something I'd not mentioned before is that mc (midnight commander)
> > doesn't work right. The display is all messed up.
> That sounds like a termcap problem....
Probably is, but I use the same termcap on Linux and NetBSD, and mc works fine
"There is no such thing as security. Life is either bold | | |
adventure, or it is nothing -- Helen Keller" | | |
________________________________________________________________ / | \
s h a n n o n @ w i d o m a k e r . c o m _/ | \_