Subject: Re: NetBSD SMP compared to Linux SMP
To: Chris Pinnock <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Kevin Sindhu <email@example.com>
Date: 06/29/2001 15:00:57
Chris Pinnock wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 02:10:18PM -0700, Kevin Sindhu wrote:
> > Anyway, the reason I ask this after reading an old article from Greg
> > Lehey on FreeBSD development for SMP, I wasn't able to find much on
> > NetBSD. A search on NetBSD SMP turned out many fruitless (chickenless
> > even?) hits.
> Back to your original mail: what are you trying to measure? Linux SMP
> has been around for a while (albeit in kernel patches rather than
> official Linus-approved code). NetBSD SMP is rather ``new''.
Well, we have this production E250 SPARC and a Dual-PIII Server
running Solaris and Linux respectively. The reason why we need such
power is to work with a certain server which is a pain to get running.
Its runs on Solaris and needs an oracle DB to talk to. At present I
have gotten it to work with Oracle 8.0.5 on a NetBSD linux emul, but
performance is not that great, not for production anyway; but its
somewhat comparable to the Oracle running on the Linux box. My
co-workers disagree it(NetBSD) not being that to run at par with the
Linux SMP box.
I did read a few reviews particularly
http://www.daemonnews.org/200008/dadvocate.html by Greg Lehey which
does talk about SMP in detail. A glance throught the NetBSD SMP List
did not turn up much, and not many docs/specs on SMP in NetBSD are
avaiable, and hence the question.