wojtek@wojtek.3miasto.net writes:

> > > > inefficient way of implementing kernel threads", but I haven't really
> > > > heard any arguments as to why it necessarily has to be? Why would it
> > > 
> > > because context switching takes time, especially in linux with lots of
> > > processes.
> > 
> >  Do you have concrete numbers, do you? Could you please show us them, it's
> 
> naver made any measurements with numbers. just tried to run 2000 sleep 1h
> processes in background as root and looking at general system slowdown
> after it (no swapping)

 This has nothing with context switching.

Take care,
O