On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Stephane St Hilaire wrote:
> I'm not sure what is your point... Is 4090 processes an insufficient number
> ? Does a program made up of one executable/two threads require more
> ressources and run slower than a program that forks itself up and uses twice
> the amount of memory ? Are you saying that threads are not useful in an OS
> and should never be a part of NetBSD ?

I think he's saying that Linux's implementation of threads shouldn't be
a part of NetBSD. Threads in general aren't bad.