Subject: RE: NetBSD is not Linux
To: 'firstname.lastname@example.org' <email@example.com>
From: Stephane St Hilaire <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/06/2001 16:32:10
[mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 10:07 AM
To: Thomas Mueller
Subject: Re: NetBSD is not Linux
>> I am new to NetBSD, downloaded for a preview onto a hard disk which
>> inaccessible (not sure if it's that particular hard disk that went bad).
>> notice Linux is far ahead of NetBSD for multiprocessor support, and Linux
>linux had multiprocessing long before netbsd. but how about it's quality?
Linux has pthreads too.
>> ELF long before NetBSD. Linux has an anarchy of many distributions, some
Linux has many distributions yes, what makes that an anarchy exactly ?
>> Red Hat) seeming to go out of their way to out-Windows MS-Windows with
>exactly. good there are people who see that.
I haven't used linux all that long but kde and gnome looked pretty much the
same on linux as they do on NetBSD. I might have missed something.