Subject: Re: Strange or unclear open source licenses in NetBSD tree
To: Jeremy C. Reed <reed@reedmedia.net>
From: Rick Kelly <rmk@toad.rmkhome.com>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 05/30/2001 20:39:49
Jeremy C. Reed said:
>On Thu, 31 May 2001, Frank van der Linden wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:51:05AM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
>> > /usr/src/lib/libc/rpc/DISCLAIMER
>> > Users may copy or modify Sun RPC without charge, but are not authorized to
>> > license or distribute it to anyone else except as part of a product or
>> > program developed by the user.
>>
>> The Sun RPC code has been in NetBSD (and FreeBSD and OpenBSD and I
>> believe in various Linux distributions) for quite a while now.
>> Nobody has ever seen this clause as a problem, and I do not think
>> it is. We are distributing it as part of a product; NetBSD.
>
>My particular concern is with taking a code snippet from the Sun RPC code
>and distributing it with the entire DISCLAIMER license. The definition of
>the word "product" is vague. Is an uncompilable code snippet a "program"
>or a "product"?
This particular bit of Sun RPC source code has been around forever.
It has been used in, at least:
Xenix
SCO UNIX
UNIX SVR2
UNIX SVR3
UNIX SVR3
Dynix
Dynix/ptx
CRDS UNOS
ESIX
and many other derivatives of sysv and bsd.
It was to Sun's advantage to "give away" this code
as it lead to interoperability.
--
Rick Kelly rmk@rmkhome.com www.rmkhome.com