> their good documentation.  That is good in a way, but with many users 
> using the OS, it brings down the average intelligence level of the 
> userbase.  What I'm probably trying to say is, if NetBSD gets to 
> 'user friendly' it will probably turn into Redhat or FreeBSD and the 

yes. and i wish it will never get!!!!!

> mailinglist will be full with newbies who don't read the 
> documentation and/or want quick answers without doing any research.  

yes. like todays linux mailinglists where people want better or cheaper
"windows replacement". 

> Personally I think the man pages are sufficient for documentation.  

compared to linux i found standard BSD manpages excellent. 

> But more examples on certain expert stuff would be nice. Perhaps 
> users could submit examples of complex setups to the NetBSD website 
> maintainers or something... (I would really like to see how people 
> are using IPsec with NetBSD).
> 
> Cheers
> 
> (PS: This is off topic, but is it just me or does NetBSD have less 
> security related bugs than OpenBSD?  I went to both websites to check 
> the patches for the latest releases, seems like OpenBSD has a bunch.  
> That's pretty cool :-)

yes. but OpenBSD (as stated on their www page) have "no security holes in
default installation for 3 years".

netbsd too - as it does not run any daemons until configured to do that :)

that's good.