Subject: Re: BOUNCE email@example.com: Approval required:
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Julian Stacey <email@example.com>
Date: 08/07/2000 00:34:30
> From: Herb Peyerl <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2000 06:23:05 -0600
> Message-id: <200008051223.GAA16401@lager.beer.org>
Herb Peyerl wrote:
> email@example.com wrote:
> > SFBA NUG drinkers spam planet wide again on netbsd-announce, & again
> > Postmaster@netbsd.org fails to moderate netbsd-announce@ to strip local dr
> > junk & maintain signal/noise ratio. Cut The Crap SFBA NUG, Use a local
> > mail list, pointed to from www.netbsd.org for visitors to SF.
> Actually, 'postmaster' doesn't moderate netbsd-announce. I do. I also
> determine the criteria for passing posts to the list, and as a result,
> your post was not deemed applicable so I didn't approve it.
> so quit whining.
I apologise for wrongly naming you. I had recalled writing you before about
this, & getting no action, but it seems it's Herb at fault, not yours. Sorry !
Others, Please write Herb Peyerl <firstname.lastname@example.org> (as moderator
of netbsd-announce@ ) that spamming the world about BSD booze ups in SF
severely degrades the signal to noise ratio of announce@ compared with _real_
announcements, EG major new releases, ports new this month, security etc.
Cross posting SF netbsd-advocacy@ & netbsd-users@ is debatable, but arrogantly
spamming netbsd-announce@ with SFBA NUG drinks venues just degrades announce@ .
Julian Stacey http://bim.bsn.com/~jhs/
Munich Unix Consultant.