Subject: Re: RAIDframe works fine, but I'm wondering...
To: Greg Oster <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Anders Dinsen <email@example.com>
Date: 07/25/2000 22:15:05
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Greg Oster wrote:
> Anders Dinsen writes:
> > On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Anders Dinsen wrote:
> > :-) it's actually faster...
> What does your raid config file look like? It could be that there is some
> room for tweaking the performance a bit :)
Here it is:
1 3 0
32 1 1 0
I suppose the only parameter I can experiment with is the stripe unit
Here's what dmesg has to say about my disks;
sd1 at scsibus0 targ 1 lun 0: <DEC, RZ25 (C) DEC, 0700> SCSI2 0/direct fixed
sd1: 406MB, 1476 cyl, 9 head, 62 sec, 512 bytes/sect x 832527 sectors
If I used that information, a cylinder is 34 blocks, so I'm pretty close
at that. No, there's probably not much to do than replace the old disks
While I'm pasting from dmesg: why does it say:
/dev/sd1e is not clean!
for each of the components during boot?