Subject: Re: RAIDframe works fine, but I'm wondering...
To: Greg Oster <oster@cs.usask.ca>
From: Anders Dinsen <anders2@dinsen.net>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 07/25/2000 06:21:33
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Anders Dinsen wrote:
> See you on the other side of this adventure :-) (my /home and most other
> user files are on the new disk).
I'm there now, running RAID 0 on three identical disks! :-) Performance is
not as good as I had hoped, but that is not RAIDframe's fault, but my old
DEC disks. Here's bonnie output:
-------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
64 670 41.2 925 18.8 564 23.0 1075 97.5 1378 43.0 34.5 12.3
I have'nt got a 'before' listing, so for comparison, this is a 1.2 G
HP3724 disk:
-------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
64 1117 93.5 1517 45.6 818 42.0 1157 94.8 1936 60.9 41.8 8.7
:-) it's actually faster...
- Anders