Subject: Re: RAIDframe works fine, but I'm wondering...
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jorgen Lundman <email@example.com>
Date: 07/24/2000 10:15:47
Greg Oster wrote:
> If you're wanting to do pure concatentation of different-sized disks,
> then you'll have to use ccd, since RAIDframe doesn't handle that...
> If the disks are all the same, then using a RAID 0 w/ RAIDframe > should work
> just fine..
What ? really? Is this something I should worry about? I have a 30gig
partition on boot disk, 40gig disk, and a 45 gigs disk, they seemed to
raid0 together beautifully, but haven't been used much yet. Will they
fall over later on?
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/raid0e 102053179 27 96950493 0% /disk01
While I'm on the subject, thinking of a simple way of doing on disk
encryption (crypt filesystem) and RAID looked to be fairly promising.
Do all READ and WRITE requests go through one set of functions in it?
The rf_netbsdkintf.c file looks promising, it has raidread() and
raidwrite() which both call raidstrategy().
Jorgen "Lord" Lundman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Technology Manager, Unix Administrator
Phone: +44 (020)8659-1860 Mobile: (07958)642-918
"Rare is the person who can weigh the faults of others
without putting his thumb on the scales": Byron J. Langenfeld