On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 11:11:17AM -0800, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> Nonsense!  LFS has been in the source tree for a *very* long time (since
> at least the 4.4BSD-Lite code came in).

But it was not used.

> 
> [...]
> Well, while there are still bugs, it's been shaken out quite a bit
> in the last few months by Konrad Schroder, and works pretty well,
> for the most part.  However, LFS isn't good for all types of workloads,
> so this is one of the reasons it's not more widely used.

I still do have crashes (pool corruption, "free inode isn't", ...).
I have to newfs it on a regular basis. Don't use it for critical data yet.
A restore may take longer than fsck :)

--
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI.           Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
--