Subject: Re: /usr/home
To: Nathan Dorfman <nathan@rtfm.net>
From: George Sollish <gsollish@mail.gisco.net>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 01/24/2000 10:04:35
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Nathan Dorfman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 11:06:56AM -0500, George Sollish wrote:
> > On my office i386 box I run 1.4.1 with the default plux X partition
> > scheme, which puts /home and /var in / . Not only does this
> > result in a lot being written to /, but Netscape caches rapidly eat into
> > the space. FreeBSD 3.2 (at home) creates a separate /var and links /home
> > to /usr/home. This appears to be a better scheme, both for space and for
> > maintaining a clean /. Is there a good reason not to do this in 1.4.1?
>
> # mv /home /usr
> # ln -s usr/home /
Actually how to do it wasn't the question, and since no one said it was a
bad idea (which was) I've made the move on my three boxes. The question
remains, in this age of browser caches and such, shouldn't the default be
/usr/home?
George E Sollish Chief Engineer Auto Gear Equipment
Host Classic-FM's Listening Room
Project Manager The Payne Lake Project