Subject: Re: Another Manual ???
To: None <netbsd-users@netbsd.org>
From: Paul Hoffman <phoffman@proper.com>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 01/21/2000 17:58:02
At 08:35 PM 1/21/00 -0500, Matthew Orgass wrote:
> The benefit of DocBook is that the documentation is ready for
>publishing.
Agreed.
> This isn't true with POD or man pages.
Disagree. Book publishers can take formatted or unformatted text in and
turn it into a book. They do it all the time. They don't *like* doing it,
but they'll do it just fine, particularly for a not-heavily-formatted book
such as this one will be. (I speak from experience here; I've written about
15 computer books over the last 16 years...)
> While SGML isn't
>trivial to learn,
UNDERSTATEMENT ALERT! :-)
> I think that a detailed guide to how it should be used
>for NetBSD documentation would make it easy enough to learn. Those who
>don't want to learn it can submit additions or corrections as text and let
>others translate.
That could be done, but it could be more easily done for POD. I truly think
you're overengineering the problem and will possibly drive away contributors.
> If this project does go forward, I would like to try to have it done by
>the 1.5 release (if it isn't going to happen too soon) and try to get
>O'Reilly to publish (at least part of) it for the release (probably with
>1.5 CDs).
Actually, I disagree. I think we should shoot for *after* the 1.5 release
so that we're sure that it is correct for 1.5. There's nothing more
frustrating to a novice user than to get a set of installation instructions
that are wrong (but were supposed to be right but the darn developers
changed something near the end...).