Subject: Re: Anyone in here object to random chatter?
To: Richard Rauch <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Mason Loring Bliss <email@example.com>
Date: 03/31/1999 10:39:05
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 08:49:15AM -0600, Richard Rauch wrote:
> The list tells us ``keep the technical content high''. Why would it say
> that if it wasn't intended for technical discussions?
I'm not saying it's *not* for technical discussions. I'm just saying that
I'd like to see the list used for chatter as well.
What useful and unique role does netbsd-users serve now, when we already
> This could be a bad idea. As a human being, I have a moderately long
> life-expectancy and eat lots of other things. Given the times that I live
> in, lots of non-degradable toxins have doubtless built up in me. But, I
> am nonetheless duly honored.
There's always the thumb thing... That would pretty much minimize the toxic
Mason Loring Bliss (( "In the drowsy dark cave of the mind dreams
firstname.lastname@example.org )) build their nest with fragments dropped
http://acheron.ne.mediaone.net (( from day's caravan." - Rabindranath Tagore