Subject: Re: ow to patch 1.3 sources to 1.3.1?
To: Zach Fine <czyz@u.washington.edu>
From: David Brownlee <abs@anim.dreamworks.com>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 05/10/1998 17:06:49
	Did you try 'make build' from /usr/src?

		David/absolute

  -=-  "Old Red he died, and every single landlord in the district cried"  -=-

On Sun, 10 May 1998, Zach Fine wrote:

> 
> Hmmm, now that I've successfully patched the sources to 1.3.1 (or so I
> think), I'm having trouble compiling them.
> 
> Here's a few lines of output just to show what I'm talking about:
> ___________________________________________________________________
> 
> jehosephat% make
> all ===> lib
> all ===> lib/csu
> all ===> lib/csu/i386
> all ===> lib/csu/c++
> all ===> lib/libarch
> all ===> lib/libarch/i386
> all ===> lib/libc
> cc -O  -Werror -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
> -Wpointer-arith  -DNLS -DYP -DLIBC_SCCS -DSYSLIBC_SCCS -D_REENTRANT
> -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DPOSIX_MISTAKE
> -DFLOATING_POINT -c /usr/src/lib/libc/string/strftime.c
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> /usr/src/lib/libc/string/strftime.c:47: warning: function declaration
> isn't a prototype
> /usr/src/lib/libc/string/strftime.c:47: warning: function declaration
> isn't a prototype
> /usr/src/lib/libc/string/strftime.c:47: warning: function declaration
> isn't a prototype
> /usr/src/lib/libc/string/strftime.c:48: warning: function declaration
> isn't a prototype
> /usr/src/lib/libc/string/strftime.c:75: warning: function declaration
> isn't a prototype
> /usr/src/lib/libc/string/strftime.c:281: warning: function declaration
> isn't a prototype
> /usr/src/lib/libc/string/strftime.c:298: warning: function declaration
> isn't a prototype
> /usr/src/lib/libc/string/strftime.c:313: warning: function declaration
> isn't a prototype
> /usr/src/lib/libc/string/strftime.c:36: warning: `rcsid' defined but
> not used
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop.
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop.
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop.
> jehosephat% 
> ________________________________________________________________
> 
> Any help would be appreciated. Actually, perhaps I should just extract
> the base distribution (is there anything new in the comp set?) and
> then compile only a 1.3.1 kernel as opposed to compiling all the
> sources.  
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -Zach Fine
> czyz@u.washington.edu
>