On Wed, 5 Jul 1995, Jason Thorpe wrote:

> On Wed, 5 Jul 1995 13:18:19 -0400 (EDT) 
>  "Mr. Rich Reybok" <rich@alpha.fdu.edu> wrote:
> 
>  > Hi, I'm looking for some real-life examples that a 486 running NetBSD can 
>  > handle being the main nameserver for a domain. I need to convince my 
>  > boss that it is possible and I would like to present him with some 
>  > cold-hard facts. Any help would be appreciated.
> 
> I'm not using an i486, but rather an hp380 (a fair amount slower) as a 
> primary nameserver.  Works terrific.  I know of at least one other hp380 
> running NetBSD and acting as a primary nameserver.

  I also have a NetBSD DNS server.  It is running 1.0 (with patches).  
Currently its uptime is 28 days.  Last downtime was to add more RAM.  

  The named process now consumes 10588K and has been running since Jun 9, 
so it seems to be handling a fair number of requests, but I don't have 
stats enabled.

Tom