Subject: Re: Port benchmarks
To: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr>
From: Douglas Wade Needham <cinnion@infinet.com>
List: netbsd-ports
Date: 03/26/2000 16:59:26
Sender: netbsd-ports-owner@netbsd.org

Quoting Manuel Bouyer (bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr):
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:57:15AM +1000, Simon Burge wrote:
> > *Local* Communication bandwidths in MB/s - bigger is better
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > Host                OS  Pipe AF    TCP  File   Mmap  Bcopy  Bcopy  Mem   Mem
> >                              UNIX      reread reread (libc) (hand) read write
> > --------- ------------- ---- ---- ---- ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -----
> > i386-netb  NetBSD 1.4.1   39   39   36     29    201     92     68  201    92
> > alpha-net   NetBSD 1.4J   93  103          92    148     79     77  149   129
> > alpha-dec     OSF1 T5.0  411  366         438   1158    527    293 1153   486
> > 
> > The first is my _old_ DEC Prioris PPro 166 (to show that DEC sometimes
> > got memory bandwidth right in the past), the middle is a PC164 (whose
> > number match up with hbench) and the last is a DS20 (to show that they
> > still can sometimes get memory bandwidth right ;).
> 
> I have a DS 20 running NetBSD 1.4U.
> Could you send me the parameters you gave to lmbench, so that we can compare ?

Please post them here!  I was getting ready to do some baseline
benchmarks on a couple of my machines including a HP9000/F10 running HP/UX
10.20 and a P100 running either BSD/OS 3.0 or 1.4.1.  Using a
common set of parameters could help in doing some apples-to-oranges
comparisons immediately, as well as some apples-to-apples comparisons
later. 

-- 
Douglas Wade Needham                  UN*X Consultant & BSD kernel programmer
Email:  cinnion @ infinet . com       http://www.infinet.com/~cinnion