Subject: Re: SGI port?
To: der Mouse <email@example.com>
From: Stefan Grefen <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/27/1997 16:49:53
In message <199706271436.KAA20032@Twig.Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA> der Mouse wrote:
> > [...] SGI port [...]
> > Is there general interest in such a port?
> Depending on which SGI hardware you're talking about, definitely. I
> know a lab that's got a bunch of Personal Irises that are being
> orphaned by SGI (we've been told 5.3 will be the last release that
> supports them). They're the most important ones, but I'd really love
> to have a _real_ OS to run on the SGI hardware.
I was at the SGI Developer conference in San Fransico in June, and in
a talk about free-software we were told they've given at least 3
machines (Personal Irises I think) to people doing a Linux port.
They've a limited amount of machines, and I think won't loan more machines
beifre the Linux port is done. But maybe we can get hold of the Linux
port and go from there.
I can give you the mail address of the SGI guy.
> Unfortunately SGI is yet another computer company that's walked down
> the "solutions" path of good intentions. I see it over and over: a
> company starts selling computers and does well, then some suit decides
> they need to change their focus and they start selling "solutions"
> instead and the company goes all to hell. It's happened to DEC, it's
> happened to Sun, and I don't know if SGI ever was selling just
> computers, but if so, it's definitely happened to them.
It'll be a cold day in hell, before the suits figure out that you
can't just sell solutions.
> der Mouse
> 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Stefan Grefen Tandem Computers Europe Inc.
email@example.com High Performance Research Center
If a group of N persons implements a COBOL compiler, there will be N-1
passes. Someone in the group has to be the manager.
-- T. Cheatham