Subject: Re: RedHat vs NetBSD
To: Patrick Welche <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: None <email@example.com>
Date: 09/17/1996 14:20:29
If you use NetBSD on an existing system thats a good reason to
prefer it on a new system (all else being equal).
Personally I'd go with NetBSD, but thats just me :)
Its probably worth subscribing to firstname.lastname@example.org whatever
.---- I've been too drunk to love ----.--- I've been too drunk to remember -.
| Too drunk to care | The hell of the night before |
| Looked like death, felt like Hell | I've been drinking myself blind |
`------ Been the worse for wear ------'--- And still I'll drink some more --'
On Sun, 15 Sep 1996, Patrick Welche wrote:
> The digital 'Universal Desktop Boxes' based on 166MHz alpha 21066 or
> 233MHz alpha21068 CPUs come with RedHat Linux. Is there any obvious
> advantage in replacing it with NetBSD? (Other than my personal liking
> of netbsd-arm32.)
> Any comments would be appreciated.