Subject: Re: Netscape 2.0beta1 - Port of HotJava to FreeBSD and NetBSD More Usefull?
To: Pete Delaney <pete@RockyMountain.rahul.net>
From: Terry Lambert <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/13/1995 14:10:02
> > > I heard there was some fairly good progress being made on a Linux port.
> > > Is this true? Because if the Linux people have a working version, then a
> > > FreeBSD/NetBSD version would be almost trivial from there.
> > Not so. According to Linus (and Alan Cox), Linux has kernel
> > multithreading.
> I suppose a thread library, like SusOS has, is likely necessary, but I
> really doubt kernel multithreading is necessary. Any bets?
Sun's multithreading as of Solaris is a kernl/user space cooperative
model, with n kernel threads being mapped to m user space threads
(m >= n).
So the only real threading on Solaris is kernel.
The SunOS LWP library (a purely aioread/aiowrite/aiowait/aiocancel based
task switcher) is supported via the kernel calls for binaray compatability
reasons, but an lwp library is not provided for Solaris: you are expected
to use the kernel thread model.
SVR4.2 and above uses the same model.
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.