Subject: Re: Netscape 2.0beta1 - Port of HotJava to FreeBSD and NetBSD More Usefull?
To: None <asami@cs.berkeley.edu, ports@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu, se@zpr.uni-koeln.de,>
From: Pete Delaney <pete@RockyMountain.rahul.net>
List: netbsd-ports
Date: 10/10/1995 22:35:08 
   > >} Well, so what do you guys think about updating the "port"?  (I know,
   > >} it's a binary-only port and we can't distribute the distfile/package
   > >} anyway....)  I've been using it since yesterday, and it feels really
   > >} "beta", so I won't update the port unless people really want the
   > >} change to go in.
   > 
   > I dislike this idea, it contains too many bugs for everyday usage
   > comparing to old version.

   > BTW, I think separate port (netscape2) will be nice addition.

Wouldn't a complete port of HotJava to SunOS 4.1.4, FreeBSD, NetBSD, 
and Linux be more in the tradition of BSD? I hate being SourceLess.

-pete