Subject: Re: Netscape 2.0beta1 - Port of HotJava to FreeBSD and NetBSD More Usefull?
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,>
From: Pete Delaney <pete@RockyMountain.rahul.net>
Date: 10/10/1995 22:35:08
> >} Well, so what do you guys think about updating the "port"? (I know,
> >} it's a binary-only port and we can't distribute the distfile/package
> >} anyway....) I've been using it since yesterday, and it feels really
> >} "beta", so I won't update the port unless people really want the
> >} change to go in.
> I dislike this idea, it contains too many bugs for everyday usage
> comparing to old version.
> BTW, I think separate port (netscape2) will be nice addition.
Wouldn't a complete port of HotJava to SunOS 4.1.4, FreeBSD, NetBSD,
and Linux be more in the tradition of BSD? I hate being SourceLess.