In article <199412120049.TAA21744@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu>,
Charles M. Hannum <mycroft@gnu.ai.mit.edu> wrote:
> 
>    I heard that there is an "offical, unsupported" port of NetBSD to Mach.
> 
> I've never heard of such a thing.  I've heard of a Mach kernel built
> under NetBSD, but that's significantly differnet.
> 
> Regardless, I'm not sure what the Hell `official' means in this
> context.

I just read that article (<3cfoue$6ia@cmir.arnes.si>). It says "offically
unsupported", not "official, unsupported", which makes more sense.

-- 
Ty Sarna                 "You know, we live in the age of the superhighway
tsarna@endicor.com        information network thing..." -- Dave Letterman