Subject: Re: Mach port
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Ty Sarna <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/12/1994 02:36:10
In article <199412120049.TAA21744@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu>,
Charles M. Hannum <email@example.com> wrote:
> I heard that there is an "offical, unsupported" port of NetBSD to Mach.
> I've never heard of such a thing. I've heard of a Mach kernel built
> under NetBSD, but that's significantly differnet.
> Regardless, I'm not sure what the Hell `official' means in this
I just read that article (<firstname.lastname@example.org>). It says "offically
unsupported", not "official, unsupported", which makes more sense.
Ty Sarna "You know, we live in the age of the superhighway
email@example.com information network thing..." -- Dave Letterman