On Jan 13, 2004, at 12:00 AM, Martti Kuparinen wrote:
>>
>
> The small partition is no longer needed (if you are using -current). I 
> haven't
> updated the above page though...
>
> Martti

I was planning on sticking to 1.6_STABLE, as I have not yet explored 
-current.  While I would prefer an incremental change, if moving to 
-current makes life significantly easier I can look into doing that.

If I stick with 1.6_STABLE, do I need to create the additional 
partition when I install NetBSD on the first disk prior to activating 
RAIDframe, or is it better to allow this to be created as part of the 
reconstruction process?

cheers,

Brad