On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 05:18:42PM +0100, Lubos Vrbka wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > How does FVWM2 compare as far as size?  Is it one of the
> > larger WMS or smaller ones?
> >
> > Sam
> 
> hi,
> it's quite small and fast(relatively, i checked it now, libs + share stuff +
> binary ~ 5mb). two of my collegues use this, it was running very fast even
> on old pentium. i don't like the style of this wm very much, but it
> definitely is one of the lightweight ones... i prefer windowmaker to fvwm2

Well, I have friends who were quite happy with fvwm2 on 12 MHz DECstations.
Personally, I preferred ctwm over fvwm. What cemented ctwm for me was
when I logged into a lab box while chatting with a friend, and my friend
noticed my X session coming up. He said "Uh, Kevin? Did your screen just
fade in from black? You've been spending waaaaaaaayyyyy too much time in
the lab."
-- 
Kevin P. Neal                                http://www.pobox.com/~kpn/
      'Concerns about "rights" and "ownership" of domains are inappropriate.  
 It is appropriate to be concerned about "responsibilities" and "service" 
 to the community.' -- RFC 1591, page 4: March 1994