Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>cgd@broadcom.com writes:
>>  There's one bizarre feature of *roff (at least, as far as I know it's
>>  a feature of *roff) that most people don't get and which is ... not so
>>  intuitive:
>>
>>	no more than N args to a macro
>
>Ah, but with groff, you can fix that (and I believe we're going to
>bite the bullet and do that.)
>

Sounds good, but if you do, it might be well to warn anybody who does 
it that it may be incompatible with other Unixen!

Dan Killoran