Subject: Re: /kernel: arp: error message
To: None <netbsd-help@netbsd.org>
From: Wolfgang Rupprecht <wolfgang+gnus20011209T112734@wsrcc.com>
List: netbsd-help
Date: 12/09/2001 11:42:45
jklowden@schemamania.org (James K. Lowden) writes:
> Questions to the world: Do cable modem networks create private
> virtual circuits to the "central office" as it were? If Pete's rl0
> were in promiscuous mode, could he see his neighbors' traffic? And
> do the terms of service with his provider include the commandment,
The early cable modem I had (LanCity, 10Mbit/sec bidirectional!) was a
very lightly filtered bridge. One saw all the ethernet broadcasts
(mostly arp-requests) and arp-reply's but none of the other unicast
traffic. My current cable modem (RCA DOCSIS 215 128kbits/sec-uplink,
1.5Mbits/sec down) is a much more heavily filtered bridge. One only
sees ethernet-level broadcasts. So in summary, mine is not really a
VPN, but its not an easily snoop-able system either. (Your mileage
will almost certainly vary. Folks running PPPoE on their cable modem
may not every see other machine's broadcasts.)
-wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Rupprecht <wolfgang+gnus@dailyplanet.wsrcc.com>
http://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/
Coming soon: GPS mapping tools for Open Systems. http://www.gnomad-mapping.com/