On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 10:02:57AM -0600, David Kanter wrote:
> This is the logging that was done. Perhaps it's helpful:
> 
> Nov 17 09:36:29 localhost pppd[271]: pppd 2.4.0 started by david, uid 0
> Nov 17 09:36:30 localhost chat[274]: abort on (BUSY)
> Nov 17 09:36:30 localhost chat[274]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
> Nov 17 09:36:30 localhost chat[274]: abort on (NO DIALTONE)
> Nov 17 09:36:30 localhost chat[274]: send (ATZ^M)
> Nov 17 09:36:30 localhost chat[274]: expect (OK)
> Nov 17 09:36:30 localhost chat[274]: ATZ^M^M
> Nov 17 09:36:30 localhost chat[274]: OK
> Nov 17 09:36:30 localhost chat[274]:  -- got it
> Nov 17 09:36:30 localhost chat[274]: send (AT&F1M0^M)
> Nov 17 09:36:30 localhost chat[274]: expect (OK)
> Nov 17 09:36:30 localhost chat[274]: ^M
> Nov 17 09:36:30 localhost chat[274]: AT&F1M0^M^M
> Nov 17 09:36:30 localhost chat[274]: OK
> Nov 17 09:36:30 localhost chat[274]:  -- got it
> Nov 17 09:36:30 localhost chat[274]: send (ATDT**********^M)
> Nov 17 09:36:31 localhost chat[274]: expect (CONNECT)
> Nov 17 09:36:31 localhost chat[274]: ^M
> Nov 17 09:37:00 localhost chat[274]: ATDT***********^M^M
> Nov 17 09:37:00 localhost chat[274]: CONNECT
> Nov 17 09:37:00 localhost chat[274]:  -- got it
> Nov 17 09:37:00 localhost chat[274]: send (^M)
> Nov 17 09:37:00 localhost pppd[271]: Serial connection established.
> Nov 17 09:37:00 localhost pppd[271]: Using interface ppp0
> Nov 17 09:37:00 localhost pppd[271]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/tty03
> Nov 17 09:37:02 localhost pppd[271]: local  IP address 144.74.60.71
> Nov 17 09:37:02 localhost pppd[271]: remote IP address 144.74.60.19
> Nov 17 09:43:21 localhost pppd[271]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
> Nov 17 09:43:21 localhost pppd[271]: Connection terminated.
> Nov 17 09:43:21 localhost pppd[271]: Connect time 6.4 minutes.
> Nov 17 09:43:21 localhost pppd[271]: Sent 4457 bytes, received 80471 bytes.
> Nov 17 09:43:23 localhost pppd[271]: Exit.

All looks good here. When you're connected, do you have a default route
to 144.74.60.19 (netstat -rn will tell you) ?
If it's there then I suspect it's a routing problem on the remote end, or
that some traffic is filtered.

--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
--