> 'vi' in particular is one that tends to drive people nuts on Linux.
> For vi, we use 'nvi', the clone written by Keith Bostic (one of the
> Berkeley CSRG guys).  He went out of his way to be bug-compatible with
> traditional vi.

Plz correct me if i am wrong, but i thought vi is written by the CSRG and appeared in 2BSD (the Berkeley PDP-11 system) and is definitly not a gnu tool. I could be wrong. Plz tell me if i am. Bye,

Reinoud.