Subject: Re: Problems with union mounting
To: David Brownlee <abs@anim.dreamworks.com>
From: Brian C. Grayson <bgrayson@ece.utexas.edu>
List: netbsd-help
Date: 09/29/1997 11:41:00
David Brownlee wrote:
>
> On Sat, 27 Sep 1997, William O Ferry wrote:
>
> > [ -- Union mounting local changes over /usr/src, then adding NFS -- ]
> >
> > If I NFS
> > mount the directories that make up the union mount and try to union
> > mount them together on the PC side, I get "mount_union: Operation not
> > supported".
> >
> > Is there some way to get NetBSD to export local mounts, such as
> > union mounts? Or is there some way to get around mount_union's
> > complaint??
> >
> From the BUGS section of 'mount_union'
> "Without whiteout support from the filesystem backing the
> upper layer, there is no way that delete and rename
> operations on lower layer objects can be done. An attempt
> to mount a union directory under one which does not have
> whiteout support will return EOPNOTSUPP (``Operation not
> supported'')."
> NFS does not support whiteouts :(
> Providing you don't need to delete or rename anything in the
> union filesystem, it should be possible to make NetBSD allow
> union mounts from NFS filesystems, and simply fail on unlink()
> or rename() operations.
Since your concern is in mounting versions of the source tree,
you could use OBJDIR stuff, and thus make your source tree
read-only, right? If so, mount_union allows NFS mounts.
In other words, mount_union doesn't enforce the check for whiteout
support if the upper layer is mounted readonly. Would that do
the trick?
I just verified this (actually, I thought from the above
comment in the man page that it wouldn't work, but it did, and
I UTSL'd to make sure that it did for the right reasons...) by
doing `union_mount -oro' of a copy of my ~/bin (which is via
NFS) on top of ~/foo (which is also via NFS). It works, even as
a mere user. Of course, I can't unmount them -- ~/bin is
/home/orac/bgrayson/bin, whereas the _real_ path name is
/a/orac/home/orac/bgrayson/bin. :|
Should the man page be updated to mention in the bugs section
or elsewhere that whiteouts are only required for read-write
mounts? If so, I'll send in a PR.
Brian
--
Brian Grayson (bgrayson@ece.utexas.edu)
Graduate Student, Electrical and Computer Engineering
The University of Texas at Austin
Office: ENS 406 (512) 471-8011
Finger bgrayson@orac.ece.utexas.edu for PGP key.