>From: Chris G Demetriou <Chris_G_Demetriou@UX2.SP.CS.CMU.EDU>
>Actually 'real more', i.e. the 'more' that we had previously, was an
>older version of less that had been hacked to make it act like 'more'.

It must have been a good hack -- I had never noticed anything that made
me suspect it was not the original more.

>The new version has been hacked to do the same.  If you find any
>differences that are annoying to you, submit them as bugs.  It's my
>opionion that if it's called 'more', it should act exactly like 'more'
>did...  8-)

Since the old hack was good, the new one should be too.  I'm just a little
jumpy from dealing with DU's "improved" more.  :-/

Max