Subject: Re: "Device not configured" FAQ: some incompleteness
To: Pavel Cahyna <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
Date: 09/04/2006 22:36:27
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Pavel Cahyna wrote:
> This is in fact the same case as with the above, just with a pseudo-device
> instead of a physical device.
> BTW your statement that "Using ktrace(1) can help you find what's going
> on inside a command, and to determine you what's being accessed that may
> cause the error message." is misleading. There is no need to use ktrace in
> the case mentioned. pfctl tells you what device node did it attempt to
> use. (/dev/pf)
Want to send me a patch to update the text?
I'm not 100% sure what you're suggesting to change...