Subject: Re: Typo in the RaidFrame guide.
To: David Laight <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Marcin Jessa <email@example.com>
Date: 05/05/2006 23:43:01
On Fri, 5 May 2006 08:04:30 +0100
David Laight <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:16:27PM +0000, Marcin Jessa wrote:
> > One more thing. Maybe newfs -O 1 /dev/raid0a in the 15.3.6. Setting up Filesystems
> > should also mention -O 2 since UFS2 is suitable for drives with more
> > than 1 Terabyte capacity and it is already today possible to get 750G SATA drives.
> Is it? The 'lazy' initialisation of inodes makes newfs quicker.
> But the inodes themselves are twice the size and will take up more
> system memory....
> FFSv1 should be able to handle filesystems with up to 2^32 fragments,
> With 8k fragments I make that 32TB.
Isn't sectors size is a standard - 512 bytes, giving:
2^32*512 == 2TB