Subject: Re: Typo in the RaidFrame guide.
To: Marcin Jessa <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: David Laight <email@example.com>
Date: 05/05/2006 08:04:30
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:16:27PM +0000, Marcin Jessa wrote:
> One more thing. Maybe newfs -O 1 /dev/raid0a in the 15.3.6. Setting up Filesystems
> should also mention -O 2 since UFS2 is suitable for drives with more
> than 1 Terabyte capacity and it is already today possible to get 750G SATA drives.
Is it? The 'lazy' initialisation of inodes makes newfs quicker.
But the inodes themselves are twice the size and will take up more
FFSv1 should be able to handle filesystems with up to 2^32 fragments,
With 8k fragments I make that 32TB.
Since NetBSD currently has problems describing disks over 2TB, and there
are known FS corruption issues over that limit, there is no necessity to
Remember the FS code is identical, only the sizes of some fields changed.
David Laight: firstname.lastname@example.org