Subject: Re: Typo in the RaidFrame guide.
To: Rui Paulo <>
From: Martin Husemann <>
List: netbsd-docs
Date: 05/03/2006 11:39:50
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:53:35PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
> Oops, it was wrong. wd9 makes sense.

Can anyone explain why the guid should not use "absent" now?
Maybe with a not that on older versions you should replace it with wd9 or
some other arbitrary, non-existant device?