--BRE3mIcgqKzpedwo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

"Julio M. Merino Vidal" <jmmv84@gmail.com> wrote:
=20
> we currently have xmlized versions of main port pages, but their
> look is exactly the same as before and, IMO, doesn't suit the
> aspect of the new pages.
>=20
> I've been tweaking the portpage.xsl file to make these pages fit
> in the new "look" by using the appropriate tags and styles.
> Note that the resulting xsl file is simpler than the previous one.
>=20
> What do you think?  Should I commit it?

For those really lazy people among us, could you put an html page
generated from this template online? :-)

-Jan

--=20
I seem to be having this tremendous difficulty with my lifestyle.

--BRE3mIcgqKzpedwo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFDrtkkfFtkr68iakwRAuTRAKCLEz1cdN1TZiqlC8k86ti2VtpXWACg9yPr
Dw3WFMt+Uwg4rivym3/Wbqc=
=5dEm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--BRE3mIcgqKzpedwo--