Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 2005.07.17 01:02:36 +0000, Klaus Heinz wrote:

>  | We should verify that pt_PT is the correct name for the directory.
>  | I don't have a reference at hand, but I remember having read that the

I found the reference again: RFC 3066.

>  | correct identifier is pt-PT and that DocBook is actually using the wrong
>  | syntax for that in its HTML output.
> 
> Yes, but the directory should be named pt_PT, I think.


Why would we want to have a different name for the directory?
At the moment we could easily change the scheme for directory names,
there are only zh_CN and zh_TW each containing one page (:-/).

ciao
     Klaus