Subject: Re: htdocs/pt directory
To: None <netbsd-docs@NetBSD.org>
From: Klaus Heinz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/17/2005 11:35:35
Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 2005.07.17 01:02:36 +0000, Klaus Heinz wrote:
> | We should verify that pt_PT is the correct name for the directory.
> | I don't have a reference at hand, but I remember having read that the
I found the reference again: RFC 3066.
> | correct identifier is pt-PT and that DocBook is actually using the wrong
> | syntax for that in its HTML output.
> Yes, but the directory should be named pt_PT, I think.
Why would we want to have a different name for the directory?
At the moment we could easily change the scheme for directory names,
there are only zh_CN and zh_TW each containing one page (:-/).