Subject: Re: 2.0 Guide
To: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
From: grant beattie <grant@NetBSD.org>
Date: 05/23/2004 12:40:43
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 12:54:54PM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Jason R. Fink wrote:
> > 1) Should we branch or just include a 2.0 compliant version
> > of the guide at shipping time? I do not know the best answer,
> > but, many of our CD makers are shipping the Guide. That really
> > pushes me towards branching (which cracks me up, 2 years ago I
> > would have been dead set against it but we are getting popular!).
> Don't branch - too much maintenance effort, and it's not like there's
> constant updates. We can always do it if someone wants to do a major
> rewrite for 2.1/3.0.
well - we need *some* way to keep the 2.0 docs largely unmodified so
that we can provide it to the world but still apply spelling corrections,
I kinda like what FreeBSD do in this respect, move it to eg.
Docs/2.0/ or something.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----