Subject: Re: Netboot Guide
To: grant beattie <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Byron Servies <email@example.com>
Date: 02/19/2003 09:10:29
On February 20, 2003 at 03:19, grant beattie wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 02:53:55AM +0000, Alex Kirk wrote:
> > >I think the netboot document should be converted to SGML DocBook. Then,
> > >maybe, with a little cleverness, we can generate machine-specific
> > >documents instead of one generic document with many architecture-specific
> > >parts. I don't know how to do that, but I'm pretty sure SGML provides a
> > >mechanism.
> > Ummm, quick thought: since we're all volunteers in our spare time here, and
> > since neither of us knows SGML (or so I assume by the comment above),
> > perhaps it would be smarter to not tackle a whole new language for doing
> > this -- particularly since there's not necessarily agreement on whether
> > machine-specific docs vs. a generic one with arch. specific stuff would be
> > a good idea. To the latter end there, is the netboot process so completely
> > different from machine to machine that it'd make sense to have a document
> > per architecture, that a generic overview would be impossible?
> Perhaps you are not aware, but there is now work-in-progress to
> convert the NetBSD website to Docbook XML. Docbook is not particularly
> difficult to write (or read), most people who have never seen it
> before have commented to me about how simple it is.
> This would be the obvious preference for any conversion of documents
> which is taking place.
That's great! But, as with any writing, you should concentrate
on content first and format second. Once that is done, even
just text in email, marking it up with any language is no big
I had some confusion with the netboot documents when I set up
my cobalt qube and would be happy to contribute my thoughts
on what I found confusing/problems that I had. To whom should
I send them? This list?