Julio Merino <jmmv@menta.net> wrote:

> Jan Schaumann <jschauma@netbsd.org> wrote:
> 
> > Usually we expect people to send their problems directly to www@, which
> > has a very fast turn-around time, so that (usually) PR tracking is not
> > really necessary.  But I agree that for consistency a www category might
> > be useful (but then, it's often overlapping with 'doc' in general).
> 
> Yes... `doc' may be better. So, when adding new things to documentation
> (not fixing typos, or the like), these changes should be sent to www@, right?

Hmmmm... not for everything.  For example, if you have patches against
man-pages (which clearly belong into the 'doc' category), there would
be no point in submitting them to www@.  I had thought that there was a
'doc' category for send-pr.  I'll look into this.

-Jan

-- 
'Hrrm, this reminds me of the Microsoft statement "Windows XP is the most
reliable version of Windows ever", or as we say in assembly, "nop".' - ali