NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: port-vax/55415: vax no longer preempts in a timely fashion



The following reply was made to PR port-vax/55415; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Anders Magnusson <ragge%tethuvudet.se@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, port-vax-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost,
 gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, oster%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: port-vax/55415: vax no longer preempts in a timely fashion
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 08:54:15 +0200

 Den 2020-06-25 kl. 17:00, skrev Greg Oster:
 > The following reply was made to PR port-vax/55415; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >
 > From: Greg Oster <oster%netbsd.org@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Cc:
 > Subject: Re: port-vax/55415: vax no longer preempts in a timely fashion
 > Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 08:55:50 -0600
 >
 >   On 6/25/20 3:15 AM, Anders Magnusson wrote:
 >   > The following reply was made to PR port-vax/55415; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >   >
 >   > From: Anders Magnusson <ragge%tethuvudet.se@localhost>
 >   > To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 >   > Cc:
 >   > Subject: Re: port-vax/55415: vax no longer preempts in a timely fashion
 >   > Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:10:42 +0200
 >   >
 >   >   Will it work if you only restore the removed line in cpu.h?
 >   
 >   Yes, yes it does!  So it's just one line that needs to be restored to
 >   get things working properly.
 >
 Great!
 
 The other missing line should not be needed as I understand the code in 
 sched_resched_cpu().
 ci_want_resched should always be set already when cpu_need_resched() is 
 called.
 
 I'll try to fire up my 4000/90 this weekend and see if I can find this bug.
 
 -- R
 


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index