NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: kern/55402: amd64/9.99.68/9.99.68: xen/zfs - kernel: double fault trap, code=0



The following reply was made to PR kern/55402; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Frank Kardel <kardel%netbsd.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost,
 gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/55402: amd64/9.99.68/9.99.68: xen/zfs - kernel: double fault
 trap, code=0
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 20:28:18 +0200

 That did it - the scrub run now completed successfully.
 
 Frank
 
 
 On 06/20/20 19:00, Jaromír DoleÄ?ek wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR kern/55402; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >
 > From: =?UTF-8?B?SmFyb23DrXIgRG9sZcSNZWs=?= <jaromir.dolecek%gmail.com@localhost>
 > To: "gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost" <gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
 > Cc:
 > Subject: Re: kern/55402: amd64/9.99.68/9.99.68: xen/zfs - kernel: double fault
 >   trap, code=0
 > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 18:55:28 +0200
 >
 >   Le sam. 20 juin 2020 =C3=A0 15:45, Frank Kardel <kardel%netbsd.org@localhost> a =C3=
 >   =A9crit :
 >   >  Well it goes a bit further but hits the double fault
 >   >
 >   >  now with 57 frames (two > 1k) at about the same accumulated stack size.
 >   >
 >   >  Some space was saved by the patch, but presumably not enough.
 >   
 >   OK, I've updated the patch. My previous change in
 >   vdev_queue_io_to_issue() did not work, gcc returns the stack on the
 >   end of the function, not when going out of the block.
 >   
 >   New version reduced vdev_queue_io_to_issue() to use only 160 bytes of
 >   stack instead of 1152, and dsl_scan_visitbp()+ dsl_scan_visitdnode()
 >   pair now takes 40 less bytes.
 >   
 >   Can you check if this is enough to get it through?
 >   
 >   http://www.netbsd.org/~jdolecek/zfs_reduce_stack.diff
 >   
 >   Jaromir
 >   
 


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index