NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: install/54844: ``build.sh install-image'' fails with -V USE_PIGZGZIP=yes



On Jan 8,  4:45pm, paul%whooppee.com@localhost (Paul Goyette) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: install/54844: ``build.sh install-image'' fails with -V USE_P

| The following reply was made to PR install/54844; it has been noted by GNATS.
| 
| From: Paul Goyette <paul%whooppee.com@localhost>
| To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
| Cc: martin%duskware.de@localhost
| Subject: Re: install/54844: ``build.sh install-image'' fails with -V
|  USE_PIGZGZIP=yes
| Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 08:42:50 -0800 (PST)
| 
|  On Wed, 8 Jan 2020, Paul Goyette wrote:
|  
|  > I'm not so sure this is just a size issue.  At one point I actually
|  > looked at the contents of the work directory, and found _another_
|  > work directory a couple levels down.  The lower-level work directory
|  > seemed to be the correct size.
|  >
|  > Perhaps there are some conflicting command-line args that work for
|  > xz but not for pigz?  (Guesing: Perhaps related to sym-links?)
|  
|  Well, I just checked again, and I don't see the "nested" work directory.
|  
|  So perhapas setting the size as you suggest is appropriate.

But why is it that much bigger?

christos


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index