Re: toolchain/54659: MACHINE_ARCH should be earmv5 on zaurus?

[Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR toolchain/54659; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost
Subject: Re: toolchain/54659: MACHINE_ARCH should be earmv5 on zaurus?
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 19:39:49 +0900

 >  On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 04:50:00PM +0000, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
 >  > I wonder if we should change it from earm to earmv5.
 >  > (a bit annoying to use pkgsrc binaries built for other arm ports)
 >  
 >  Isn't earm == earmv5 in our current world? The older cpus (like strongarm)
 >  get earmv4.
 
 Ah, I was just stupid and confused because build.sh had both
 earm and earmv5 for evbarm.
 
 >  But as Nick uses to say: "earm should die" (meaning: it should be earmv5
 >  to avoid this kind of confusion).
 
 I agree, but anyway I withdraw this PR.
 
 ---
 Izumi Tsutsui