[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: bin/53705: dhcpcd spams syslogd
The following reply was made to PR bin/53705; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Roy Marples <roy%marples.name@localhost>
To: Robert Elz <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost>
Cc: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, roy%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: bin/53705: dhcpcd spams syslogd
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:55:54 +0100
On 10/04/2019 15:52, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:13:07 +0100
> From: Roy Marples <roy%marples.name@localhost>
> Message-ID: <4f01bc7e-fcfb-e097-0d6c-4573ba6cc8fb%marples.name@localhost>
> | That's a totally different issue.
> Yes, understood and agreed. That's why that was just a postscript
> added on to the end of the real message.
> | Please create a new PR for it because there really is no right way of
> | solving this.
> If that latter part is correct (depending on just which "this" is in
> question) a PR would be a bit pointless, right? No point asking for
> changes if there is no way to do it.
> (And if "this" was the "my ISP should support IPv6, but doesn't" then
> I agree, there certainly does not appear to be any good solution, as
> most of the ISP's customers have no idea at all what IP is, let alone
> which version does what, or how.)
> But if you, or someone really want a PR on the "default v6 route exists
> and causes connection delays when there are no available v6 global addresses"
> issue, then sure, I can do that. It will take a while while I collect
> some packet traces, etc, and tomorrow I am unlikely to have much time,
> but sometime over the weekend I can do that ... if you really want it.
No traceroutes needed.
Just say RA received with no prefixes marked as generated a SLAAC
address, no DHCPv6 server available to hand out any IA and no static
I think that describes your situation.
Main Index |
Thread Index |